Advocate files 5 PILs, gets SC flak for raising 'frivolous' pleas
An advocate's attempt to argue five PILs, ranging from chemical-free tobacco to garlic's 'tamasic' nature, drew sharp criticism from the Supreme Court. The bench termed the petitions frivolous, suggesting they were filed for publicity. The court warned against such practices, emphasizing the need for advocates to focus on their profession rather than seeking cheap fame through PILs.
An advocate's attempt to argue five PILs, ranging from chemical-free tobacco to garlic's 'tamasic' nature, drew sharp criticism from the Supreme Court. The bench termed the petitions frivolous, suggesting they were filed for publicity. The court warned against such practices, emphasizing the need for advocates to focus on their profession rather than seeking cheap fame through PILs. What's Your Reaction?
